“Climate Change to Cost East Asia 5.3% of
GDP” cries Bloomberg. “ADB Forecasts
Soaring Asian Energy Use Through 2035”, screams the Wall Street Journal. Headlines soar after the Asian
Development Bank (ADB) released its 2013 ‘Economics of Climate Change in East
Asia’.
The statistics look grim: atmospheric CO2
concentration has just surpassed 400ppm. Responsible for 30% of world’s total
emissions, East Asia expects a rise in temperature of around 1.9-2.6°C
by 2050. Flooding, sea-level rise, intense tropical storms, drought, heatwaves
- you name it – it’s about to visit.
Increase of Climate-Related Natural Disasters (1980-2010) in the PRC - it has already begun!
Red Areas = East Asian Deltas = Flood-prone Areas
So what’s the point of this
publication, other than to fuel the air of eventual doom? It provides
strategies to adapt and mitigate climate change in three key sectors
(infrastructure, coastal zones and agriculture), including the cost to the
economy. The ADB urges East Asian countries to adopt an economic growth model
based on low carbon emissions and a more efficient use of existing resources.
Among its suggestions are:
- Jumpstart a regional carbon market to lessen the cost of carbon reduction by 25% through dividends.
- Promote low-carbon technology and enforce technical standards to buildings in order to withstand environmental change.
- Support cost-effective measures: trucks fuelled by compressed natural gas, hybrid passenger cars, etc.
In the infrastructure sector, I think the concept of
climate-proofing, or ex-ante (fancy word for ‘based on forecasts’) adaptation
will become big: buildings will be designed to cope with future climate change.
It’s basically being preventive rather than corrective.
Economically, it’s feasible: initial cost of investment +
planned adaptation + operational and management costs < probable costs of
replacing/maintaining structures not
designed to cope with future climate change.
ADB urges the People’s Republic of China, for one, to
climate-proof its roads before temperatures rise and tarmac melts. No kidding.
On a more positive note, “E. Asia needs less than 0.3 percent of GDP (over the years) to
mitigate climate change” (and this is in the worst climate scenario), says Jakarta
Post. 0.3 percent? I say that’s manageable.
Want the
details? Check out the 216-page publication.
Reference:
No comments:
Post a Comment